Search This Blog

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

More Jessica Jackson Hutchins



From the Whitney site:

"Jessica Jackson Hutchins explores the relationships between people and objects and how they both form and inform each other. To create this work, Hutchins glued newspaper articles about Barack Obama on the surface of a sofa repurposed from her childhood living room. Ceramic pieces, grouped haphazardly on the couch, can be viewed as surrogates for the people who once sat on its cushions. Couch For a Long Time fuses public and private moments, creating a sense that monumental world events can pervade everyday life."

I really like the idea of pairing handmade pottery with objects - esp furniture -in order to create an atmosphere of everyday life, the home, the human (mid america of a certain middle class quality of the past (70s?) - with the furniture type). There are parts of her work, though, that are too 'messy' to me. I can't think of a better word... I guess I just wish that there was a little more refinement in hand while still retaining the handmade and the older furniture... i think....

Jessica Jackson Hutchins







Oh my god, this is gorgeous. I am in love with this piece. Its so visceral!
Movement, weight, grime, detritus. Yet there is something loving here, something sweet - it is barely there - but it is there -- maybe in the lighter color of the forms? - or the barely recognizable human forms of lovers sweetly balancing their foreheads together - the idea of sitting in your own grime even seems positive and comforting...

Friday, October 22, 2010

Jerry's take on Ai Weiwei sunflower seed piece

From ny mag:

"Dear Jerry:

Did you get to see the big Ai Weiwei installation at London’s Tate Modern? If so, tell us about it.

—William Landau

Dear William,

I did see the Ai Weiwei, and came close to missing the entire point.

A little background: Over the past few years, Ai Weiwei has paid hundreds of skilled artisans in the Chinese city of Jingdezhen (known for its porcelain trade, now faltering) to hand-make 100 million ceramic sunflower seeds out of porcelain. He then had scores of people hand-paint every one of these seeds with three or four gray stripes of the unfired watery clay mixture known as slip. At the Tate, the replica seeds are spread out in a huge field on the floor of the Turbine Hall.

A few hours before it opened, I was in the museum looking at the Gauguin show and saw the installation from a balcony high above, as the artist was finishing the setup. Since I had another appointment, I left, writing it off as another lame installation-art gesture. I hated it.

I had no idea people were going to be allowed to walk around on it. Fortunately, I woke up the next morning feeling guilty about snap-judging such a big work (it’s a critic thing), and when I went back, I was blown away. As I stood on this field of crunchy porcelain bits, I suddenly gleaned an approximation of China itself. A hundred million seeds and the huge physical field and my tiny place in it allowed me to actually sense the billion that is China. In true colonialist fashion, I was part of the millions in the West who were now walking on the billions of the East. It was an extraordinary illustration of infinity, impossibility, life, politics, proximity, and individuality. Crowds happily walked on the seeds; it was like a metaphysical beach, or limbo. Kids ran around, played games, or buried one another. Like many others, and in violation of the rules, I took home a handful of seeds. My wife kept pointing out gray clouds that puffed up wherever people were walking. She also pointed out that our hands and clothes were covered in the dust.

I thought nothing of it.

I should have. It turns out those clouds were the gray slip being ground off the porcelain seeds as they rubbed together underfoot. Two days later authorities shut down the piece. A notice posted on the Tate’s site reads in part: “We have been advised that the interaction of visitors with the sculpture can cause dust which could be damaging to health following repeated inhalation over a long period of time. In consequence, Tate, in consultation with the artist, has decided not to allow members of the public to walk across the sculpture.” Now it can only be seen the way I saw it that first day, from above or outside. I’m saddened that you can’t see it the way I did — but the metaphor is unmistakably powerful all the same. The coming together of these civilizations and numbers produces a toxic cloud."

___________________________________________________________

My words:

I loved reading of frolicking in the porcelain seeds. It shows that something can be monumental and therefore speak $ - but I shouldn't assume that its about the artist's financial situation either (think jeff koons and matthew barney) - in this case he saved a town whose porcelain industry was in harm's way. Also, completely aside from the money facts, it sounds as if the experience of the piece had its own weight in addition to it being grandiose. It was a personal, quieter corporeal experience tied to the social and political nature of China and the west. like.

Oh Jerry (and his commenters)

I am one of the many Jerry Saltz facebook followers - i think there are 5000 of us or so....anytime he announces that he is cleaning house and taking out followers - i comment to please leave me in. I want to be in the group, man!
He has so far. We'll see.


But maybe I don't even deserve it - i will 'like' something but i don't comment very often...i am on the periphery...ever since i got into some kind of digital argument with another of his followers. It was about women in art and that's a sore spot for me (there are so many people out there trying to be provocative and poke at obvious non- politically correct sore spots for their own sport {i hate those people- they are only out for themselves and their own arrogant inside joke - bastards that need to be hit in the nuts} and they get me rowdy on sexism...still to this day... even if i try not to fall for it anymore.

Anyway - i do often read Jerry's fb posts and his ny mag articles from time to time (not often enough). I find that when reading them, i get drawn into the comments that whirl around and around and back and forth ... and hours later.... oh, i just don't have that kind of time! I honestly get lost in it. I could dive in more but I often avoid going too deep because I get overwhelmed.

Well, today, in between working - I was trying to lightly read a jerry article:

"Ask an Art Critic: Jerry Saltz Answers Your Questions About London Art and Power Lists"

(Actually, i haven't even read it yet. I will after this post and some dayjob work is done) I was somehow drawn into some comments first - jesus - comments about people trying to understand contemporary art, viewing art, conceptual theory etc.

This one gentlemen, JustinRWood, wrote eloquently about how he thinks people should look at art. It was a long thread, taking up three comment sections but I'm posting some of it here:

"Frank Gillette told me while I was at SVA about experiments that were done with newly hatched chicks. Apparently after they were hatched the researchers cast shadows on them. When the chicken hawk shadow was cast over them, they ran in fear. When they cast shadows of other non threatening birds over them, they didn't react. So somehow that fear of the chicken hawk shadow/shape was pre-engineered into the chickens. And he told me that that was what art is. "

"Looking for the intended experience in a work of art is the same thing as looking for an intended experience in life. There isn't one. Its all about leading you in to have your own experience. It is out of the artists hand.

Now, of course there is a lot writing that has been done, and there is entire scope of art history to which new works of art are always compared against and are made to fit into - but that structure is an illusion as well. Having knowledge of art history and reading criticism of contemporary art can help to enrich your experience - but they are certainly not necessary to the experience. Certainly there are a lot of artists that play with themes from art history and many many many of them that endlessly repeat certain styles and movements. So knowing about that stuff helps you to make connections and contextualize the work, but it isn't necessary."

"The perception of inaccessibility is an illusion. Artists use that to hide the fact that the work does not actually mean anything.

My most moving experiences with works of art are those with which I have no thought going through my mind. They wipe thought away and bring me into that meditative hum of consciousness feeling. That is what I am looking for works of art to do for me. They are how I get to that religious feeling."

I love what Justin has said. Don't get me wrong, I also have an affection for theory, art history, and philosophy - I can go there (there are degrees in which i go there in comparison to others that go there more often and in a deeper way than myself but, still, I do like some theory).

There is something so liberating about what he has said. And its not like i haven't heard every side of this argument -- but I think there are many people out there that hate art because of the inaccessibility - and why shouldn't they? Of course they do. Considering how much I love art, I am appreciative of Justin's words - it will allow those that felt left out to enter. It allows me, as an art maker, to not over-analyze my work while I'm making it - analyze it with others later and let it be what it is.

refreshing.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Only Fuck you - Maurizio Cattelan





I am looking at Maurizio Cattelan's work (italy) -

It is provocative.... I've always liked the hitler one because he is so small, and y
ou approach him from behind not knowing its him...and then later come around to the front to be surprised by his face.

But in looking at all of his work together - maybe it is all just one big Fuck you. I mean, its only shock value, punk rock. It isn't anything else, is it?


If something is only fuck you - how far can it reach someone? Or maybe it just bothers me because it means he, Maurizio, isn't exploring and investigating something....he isn't searching... he is just reacting like flipping someone off or punching them in the face. And that is just one thing, just one impulsive reaction. it gets nowhere.

on the other hand, in dealing with the pope, hitler and the stock exchange - maybe a big fuck you is the only thing that can be said anyway -

Ai Weiwei





Ai Weiwei: Chinese artist, architectural designer, activist

from designShrine blog- about author's own essay, "Ai Weiwei: Surgeon of Space"
    "Furniture doesn’t just ornament a given space; it remakes and redefines the internal boundaries of the space itself. If furniture is something that breaks up space, offering punctuated moments of rest and stoppage and giving rhythm to a room, then it can also be deliberately misused. It can be contrapuntal and off-kilter, designed against the grain of the space it appears within. Furniture can interrupt, challenge, and deform."

The rest of the text veers from David Cronenberg to geology, by way of Gerrit Rietveld and German tunneling machines, Stone Age tools and psychoanalysis.

From the essay:

"Ai’s "Furniture", subject to such interpretations, become not unlike allegories: small storylines in wood. They are narratives. "Tables at Right Angles", 1998, is really just one table that has misunderstood itself, reeling back from its own projected double. Mistaking its own eccentric solidity for the architecture that surrounds it, this table will never realize that the world it thinks it touches is just another part of itself. "

I like the idea of furniture taking on its own life. My furniture piece, "Untitled Furniture, 2003" and "Untitled Furniture, Feminine 2003/2010" is an example. I think that like Fisch and Weiss, inanimate objects taking on a life of their own attracts a childlike wonder, has dark emotions associated with being human vs. not human, and speaks directly to the human body itself. All of this is definitely in my conceptual art 'bag' that i am trying to develop / figure out here in this blog.

Ai Weiwei's coca cola piece: this is too poppy for me - but i do understand it from the p.o.v. of a chinese artist and the infiltration of american corp. and pop culture across the world - esp. with their rise in capitalism mixed with their communist society.

In reading a little about Ae weiwei, his activism is definitely in ridicule - or at least questioning - of the govt. of china and their abuse to its citizens - with lack of freedom of speech etc. He has even been harassed by the police in china over his outspoken-ness.

The sunflower seeds are so amazing - they are all porcelain - i think 1 million of them or so. all handmade. There is always a nod of respect to something so obviously time consuming, handmade and larger than life. I have to also mention $ in this case - the many people it took to make it - i am trying to think of an example where larger than life does not equal money in the art world.... there are examples of repetitive, intricate, obviously loved over work in the art world and made by one person. This doesn't carry $ - it carries mundane-ness, enduring passion, perseverance and obsessiveness. That is also something that is hard to ignore.

I almost feel guilty - like i'm tricked or only praising something for this one non-conceptual reason when I am wowed by grandiosity (whether by one obsessive hand, or by many- $- hands). To be wowed by grandiosity - well, it is human. Whether it is a huge decorated cathedral worked on by the masters or whether it is ocean - to realize how small one is, to realize how unimportant, maybe, one is - that has its own magic. New York City used to do that to me. That's why i fell in love with it. It was bigger than me, more powerful than me, it never ended and held so much more than me as an individual ever could. Of course, nyc, is still all of that. But i don't see it that way anymore because I can't - I have to live my daily life here so I have to make it 'smaller' so that i can navigate it. But, in life in general, it is a beautiful moment when one realizes that they are so insignificant and so small and simply a part of something so much larger. It's spiritual.

The bicycles - I am not sure what that one is about conceptually - it can't be lopped into his other artistic pursuits either.... but i like it.

Peter Fischli & David Weiss





I don't know enough about them. They are based in Switzerland. I halfway read an Art Review article about them once. I just now re-saw a video i didn't remember was theirs..."The Way things go"

I believe they made a sculpture I saw in chelsea that I was ecstatic about - a stuffed animal of a bear that was laying on the grounded sleeping - its breath subtle as the fake furry brown tummy moved up and down. I was so delighted when i saw that. More than the trickery aspect of it - i also have a love for the uncanny - in the common use of the word - and a love for the idea of inanimate objects having a life.

I just found the stuffed animal image - it was a rat and a bear - which they claim are representations of themselves. I think i remember them not making an individual claim as to who was the bear and who was the rat.

wikipedia blurb:
"For their work, they make use of a large bandwidth of artistic forms of expression: Film and photography, art-books, sculptures made out of different materials, and multimedia-installations. They adapt objects and situations of the everyday life and place them into an artistic context — often using humour and irony."

from Matthew Mark's:
"Since 1979 Peter Fischli and David Weiss have been collaborating on a body of work that combines, rearranges, or otherwise manipulates their daily experiences into something new and unexpected. Executed in a variety of media, including sculpture, film, and photography, their work playfully ignores the distinction between high and low art. The duo is perhaps best known for the 1987 film The Way Things Go, in which an improbable, Rube Goldberg–esque chain of events unfolds involving household objects and detritus in their studio."

"The Way Things Go" is entertaining to watch - no matter the increase in technology in our society; mechanical -this leads to this visible sequence- is always a thrill! Especially if fire is involved. I guess watching something that makes you wonder how it was planned, tested, the physics involve - along with the element of surprise - will always somehow connect to the human. it is playful. it is like being a kid. It is sculptural - not only the display within the room but also the individual reactions of materials to fire, water, movement - how do these materials perform? what will they do in reaction?

From Matthew Marks again:

"Fischli and Weiss won the Golden Lion prize at the 2003 Venice Biennale for Questions, an installation of over 1,000 photographic slides on which existential questions the artists had collected over many years are handwritten. "

Action, Reaction, Everyday objects used and placed in new ways, playfulness, inquiry, questions - i can see where existential questions can fit into this.... its almost like all their work is a question?

What will happen if we do this? What will happen to this bottle if it is set here like this? What will happen when we die? Is there a god?

I haven't been thorough on looking at their work... i don't know how the shoe fits in... more later.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

i admire his gestural poetic beauty - Gedi Sibony





i spin, overcomplicate, chip at, add on, remove, rearrange...overthink.
his work is gestural - unlike myself, he focuses on beauty and aesthetics strictly -- but there is a lifting of the heart and a poetic nature that I am attracted to. it isn't dry - his work.
there is a light hearted beauty I am attracted to.
from saatchi gallery online:


"In addition to minimalism, Sibony also cites inspiration from Robert Rauschenberg’s combines and Richard Tuttle’s post-minimalism in his synthesis of disparate media, and the arte povera movement in its approach to experimentation and mystical conception of the natural quality of materials."

"Delineating empty space as a comparable field by which to measure the sculpture’s existence, Side Show, Side Show wittily hovers between ‘being’ and ‘nothingness’, exuding a quiet spiritual aura in its delicate self-assertion. Presented with understated elegance, the frames operate as both a form and its shadow, action and onsequence, a receptacle and echo of viewer perception."

now that i think on it more - i think its the light pieces that i'm attracted to especially. and the other pieces ONLY in relation to the light pieces....maybe the light pieces feel more 'found everyday beauty"? vs. the rest being more obviously made (with the knowledge of the art world, that is)?

respect for but distance from paul mccarthy

continuing looking through art 21 reader -

i was thinking about paul mccarthy and how his work is so loud, jarring, rash and also pertinent and accurate of the violence of power.

i am distanced from his work by his violence though - he goes far with it - bodily, gory...

what am i wanting for my own work? I cannot deny violence or the bodily. But I also can't go as far as he... because i am then pushing the viewer out - they aren't in the room with me. i would have shoved them out with disgust.

he is the underbelly of our polite society and its structures.

from art 21:
"Paul McCarthy’s video-taped performances and provocative multimedia installations lampoon polite society, ridicule authority, and bombard the viewer with a sensory overload of often sexually-tinged, violent imagery. With irreverent wit, McCarthy often takes aim at cherished American myths and icons—Walt Disney, the Western, and even the Modern Artist—adding a touch of malice to subjects that have been traditionally revered for their innocence or purity. Whether conflating real-world political figures with fantastical characters such as Santa Claus, or treating erotic and abject content with frivolity and charm, McCarthy’s work confuses codes, mixes high and low culture, and provokes an analysis of fundamental beliefs."

Susan Rothenberg


from Art 21

"her new-found interest in
using the memory of observed and experienced events (a riding accident, a near-fatal bee sting, walking the dog, a game of poker or dominoes) as an armature for creating a painting. These scenes excerpted from daily life, whether highlighting an untoward event or a moment of remembrance, come to life through Rothenberg’s thickly layered and nervous brushwork. A distinctive characteristic of these paintings is a tilted perspective in which the vantage point is located high above the ground. A common experience in the New Mexico landscape, this unexpected perspective invests the work with an eerily objective psychological edge."

although not fixated with her work - i found the highlighted words above interesting. i've often thought of doing a photo set where i am just slightly below the subject - ever so slightly. i'd have to figure out the exact amount to ensure it rode on the edge of being directly in relation to the subject and slightly below it.

'nervous brushwork' - i like that her texture of hand might show an anxiety. definitely shows a movement...

'using the memory of observed and experienced events' : i often now get ideas only from instinct, from something entering my mind and refusing to leave. I need to build a parameter, method of filtering ideas to rebuild a conceptual framework. My old conceptual framework isn't working for me anymore -- but i haven't found the new one either. I wonder if something as simple as observed events would work for me...

Yinka Shonibare has me thinking...


I am looking at artists i am attracted to currently - and have been for awhile. What is it about their work that makes me favor them over other artists? There is a hint there for where my work can go - for where I fit in.

Right now I don't fit in at all. my work is too embryonic over and over again. Even in gradschool, i wasn't sure where I fit in. I could say I fit into 'body', 'self identity and the aftermath', feminism...what do i fit into now? Or, more accurately said, What am i working towards fitting into? For nothing i have now is finished. Nothing I have now is fleshed out. It hasn't been for years. I am going to work deeper and thoroughly - or will it always feel embryonic?! It could. ha!

I will continue to look at artist's work I admire and find my own way within it.

Yinka Shonibare's work speaks to me because:
multi - media
power
societal relations
directly human - bodily response - my teeth hurt and i salivate as i think of his wood figures and the texture of the material on the figures.
failure/mishap
darkness
folly

from art 21:


"Known for using batik in costumed dioramas that explore race and colonialism, Yinka Shonibare MBE also employs painting, sculpture, photography, and film in work that disrupts and challenges our notions of cultural identity. Taking on the honorific MBE as part of his name in everyday use, Shonibare plays with the ambiguities and contradictions of his attitude toward the Establishment and its legacies of colonialism and class. In multimedia projects that reveal his passion for art history, literature, and philosophy, Shonibare provides a critical tour of Western civilization and its achievements and failures."

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Doris Salcedo



Bio from White Cube:

"Doris Salcedo makes sculptures and installations that function as political and mental archaeology, using domestic materials charged with significance and suffused with meanings accumulated over years of use in everyday life. Salcedo often takes specific historical events as her point of departure, conveying burdens and conflicts with precise and economical means.

Her early sculptures and installations, such as La Casa Viuda (1992-1995), combined domestic furniture with textiles and clothing. Salcedo derived her materials from research into Colombia’s recent political history, so these belongings, suffused with the patina of use, were directly linked to personal and political tragedy. During the past few years, Salcedo’s work has become increasingly installation-based, using the gallery spaces or unusual locations to create vertiginous environments charged with politics and history. Noviembre 6 y 7 (2002) was a commemoration of the seventeenth anniversary of the violent seizing of the Supreme Court, Bogotá on 6 and 7 November, 1985. Salcedo sited the work in the new Palace of Justice where, over the course of 53 hours (the duration of the siege), wooden chairs were slowly lowered against the façade of the building from different points on its roof, creating “an act of memory” in order to re-inhabit this space of forgetting. In 2003, in Istanbul, she made an installation on an unremarkable street comprising 1,600 wooden chairs stacked precariously in the space between two buildings. In 2005, at the Castello di Rivoli, Turin, Salecdo re-worked one of the institution’s major rooms by extending the existing majestic, vaulted brick ceiling of the gallery. The installation subtly transformed the existing space, evoking thoughts of incarceration and entombment."


Her chairs piece is so alarmingly beautiful!!!!!Doris Salcedo makes sculptures and installations that function as political and mental archaeology, using domestic materials charged with significance and suffused with meanings accumulated over years of use in everyday life. Salcedo often takes specific historical events as her point of departure, conveying burdens and conflicts with precise and economical means.

'Her early sculptures and installations, such as La Casa Viuda (1992-1995), combined domestic furniture with textiles and clothing. Salcedo derived her materials from research into Colombia’s recent political history, so these belongings, suffused with the patina of use, were directly linked to personal and political tragedy. During the past few years, Salcedo’s work has become increasingly installation-based, using the gallery spaces or unusual locations to create vertiginous environments charged with politics and history. Noviembre 6 y 7 (2002) was a commemoration of the seventeenth anniversary of the violent seizing of the Supreme Court, Bogotá on 6 and 7 November, 1985. Salcedo sited the work in the new Palace of Justice where, over the course of 53 hours (the duration of the siege), wooden chairs were slowly lowered against the façade of the building from different points on its roof, creating “an act of memory” in order to re-inhabit this space of forgetting. In 2003, in Istanbul, she made an installation on an unremarkable street comprising 1,600 wooden chairs stacked precariously in the space between two buildings. In 2005, at the Castello di Rivoli, Turin, Salecdo re-worked one of the institution’s major rooms by extending the existing majestic, vaulted brick ceiling of the gallery. The installation subtly transformed the existing space, evoking thoughts of incarceration and entombment."

Her chair piece - i remember seeing an image years ago - still blows me away.

In her conceptual speak on memory - chairs are so interesting. Our bodies sit in them, leaving sweat, a trace of thread, a smell - on these wooden chairs. On fabric chairs - an imprint, a stain.

The way they tower up and tumble over each other - in her discussion of the memory of war - is especially powerful since the chairs stand in for the piles of bodies - captured between these two buildings - the small space between. How amazing that chairs piled up can so easily point to the bodies that would sit in them.

Her other famous piece I've seen before is the split in the flooring - like a fault line - at the Tate.
"Shibboleth"
from tate website:

"A shibboleth, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is ‘a word used as a test for detecting people from another district or country by their pronunciation; a word or sound very difficult for foreigners to pronounce correctly.’ It is, therefore, a way of separating one people from another."

"Walking down Salcedo’s incised line, particularly if you know about her previous work, might well prompt a broader consideration of power’s divisive operations as encoded in the brutal narratives of colonialism, their unhappy aftermaths in postcolonial nations, and in the stand off between rich and poor, northern and southern hemispheres."

I do wonder how she did that fault line and how they repaired it etc.

from art 21 blog: carrie mae weems



I've always admired her work. She defuses racist and sexist labels. Critique of sexism used to be a part of my own work...i'm sure its still in there somewhere. In the past several years, i've grouped her into self identity art which i felt as if i had grown out of - I also have viewed it as outdated in the art world.

But I was wrong. Just because she became famed for art based in self identity - doesn't mean that is where a growing, changing artist will stay! Of course not! I should sit back and look further instead of throwing ideas into bins and categorizing them in a memory game.

I just saw a blog post on art 21 on her. I could have 'catalogued' her and moved on like i usually do - but luckily i read it. And there is something there that still pertains to my current work I think.

"Weems’s vibrant explorations of photography, video, and verse breathe new life into traditional narrative forms—social documentary, tableaux, self-portrait, and oral history. Eliciting epic contexts from individually framed moments, Weems debunks racist and sexist labels, examines the relationship between power and aesthetics, and uses personal biography to articulate broader truths. Whether adapting or appropriating archival images, restaging famous news photographs, or creating altogether new scenes, she traces an indirect history of the depiction of African Americans for more than a century."

The blog is covering her work, 'Roaming', where she photographs her self amongst the architecture of Rome - a human body dressed all in black silhouetted against the buildings. There is something here that is other than self identity - it is also body and architecture - it opens it up to human vs. human built and the power within that - instead of the narrow(er) focus of self identity. It isn't about her being a black woman. Its about her being a human next to something built to be powerful and overwhelming. It is broader to be a human than to be a woman.

What does that mean? To look at something from the broader vs. narrower p.o.v.? Why have I, in my own work, wanted to let go of self identity (narrower) p.o.v.?

other aspects of her work that I previously ignored:
use of narrative forms to work within
Epic out of personal moment
Power and aesthetics.

Completely Machine made art



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/16/spotlight-federico-diaz-g_n_765485.html#158814

Federico Diaz "Geometric Death Frequency-141" at Mass Moca
from article, "robots, machines made to produce a sculpture without any human hands."

Roxy Pain's , Paint Dipper and Scumack are the same thing.

Does Diaz's differ in the technical differences of how its made - where does the diff./similarities lie? At first, with the numerous black balls and the static motion of the piece - i got a feeling of darkness. The title attributed to that too...

Roxy Paine (wikipedia):

In his body of work, Roxy Paine mirrors natural processes, drawing increasingly on the tension between organic and man-made environments, between the human desire for order and nature's drive to reproduce. His highly detailed simulations of natural phenomena include an ambitious series of hand-wrought stainless steel trees, vitrines of mushroom and plant life in various states of decay and several large-scale machines designed to replicate creative processes. Collectively, his works demonstrate the human attempt to impose order on natural forces, depicting the struggle between the natural and the artificial, the rational and the instinctual.

Federico Diaz: (mass moca site)

..."book made into a film"
In the case of Geometric Death Frequency-141, the "book" is a digital photograph of the museum's clocktower entry courtyard as taken by the artist, which the artist then transforms into pure data, and modulates using analytical and fluid dynamic modeling techniques, finally rendering the data stream into a three-dimensional sculpture using state-of-the-art computer-aided manufacturing methodologies. The new work thus combines elements of photographic manipulation, data analysis, and computer programming, utilizing new techniques to produce a sculpture completely untouched by human hands.


That the sculptures were made without human hands is not what Diaz seems interested in after all.
His is more of a remaking of an object that exists
into another object/image.